Google

Tuesday, April 05, 2022

USCG Gets First Female Commandant

 


NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. – The Biden administration has nominated Adm. Linda Fagan to lead the U.S. Coast Guard, a defense official told USNI News on Tuesday. Fagan, currently the Coast Guard’s vice commandant, will be the first woman to lead a U.S. military service.

Fagan has been the Coast Guard’s number two since June and was the first woman in the service to be promoted to four stars.

Prior to her current role, she led Coast Guard Pacific Area from June of 2018 to June 2021. She previously served as the deputy director of operations for headquarters at U.S. Northern Command and led First Coast Guard District, which is based in Boston, Ma. Fagan also previously served on USCGC Polar Star (WAGB-10). She spent 15 years as a Coast Guard marine inspector. Fagan is a 1985 graduate from the Coast Guard Academy.

“Adm. Fagan is a tremendous leader, trailblazer, and respected public servant who will lead the Coast Guard across its critical missions with honor. Over Adm. Fagan’s 36 years in the Coast Guard, she has served on seven continents, was previously commander of the Coast Guard Pacific Area, and is the officer with the longest service record in the marine safety field,” reads a Tuesday statement from the Department of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas.
“Within the Coast Guard and across the Department of Homeland Security, Adm. Fagan is admired as a role model of the utmost integrity, and her historic nomination is sure to inspire the next generation of women who are considering careers in military service.”

Additionally, the White House nominated Vice Adm. Steven Poulin, the current commander of Coast Guard Atlantic Area, to serve as vice commandant. Poulin was formerly the Judge Advocate General and Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard and is a 1984 Coast Guard Academy graduate.

Current commandant Adm. Karl Schultz is set to retire in May.

Schultz is a native of East Hartford, Conn., and a 1983 Coast Guard Academy graduate. Prior to serving as commandant he was the commander of the Coast Guard’s Atlantic Area, where he oversaw the Coast Guard’s response to Hurricanes Irma, Maria and Harvey in 2017.

President Joe Biden nominated Adm. Linda Fagan to be the 27th Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), according to a statement released Tuesday by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

Fagan, if confirmed, would make history as the first woman to serve as the leader of any U.S. military branch, USNI News reported. She has served as the USCG’s vice commandant since June, when she became the first female officer in the USCG to be promoted to four stars, according to the outlet. (RELATED: Biden Nominates First Female Army Secretary)

Mayorkas praised Fagan and her accomplishments in a press statement released Tuesday.

“President Biden has made an exceptional choice by nominating Admiral Linda F. Fagan to serve as Commandant of the United States Coast Guard,” he said. “Admiral Fagan is a tremendous leader, trailblazer, and respected public servant who will lead the Coast Guard across its critical missions with honor.”

Democratic Washington Sen. Maria Cantwell, chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, also praised Fagan’s “strong leadership” and “commitment to service” in a statement shared on Twitter.

 


Fagan has served 36 years in the USCG, including previously as commander of the Coast Guard Pacific Area, according to Mayorka’s statement. She has the longest service record for an officer in the Marine Safety field, a press release from the USCG noted.

Adm. Karl Schultz, the current commandant of the Coast Guard, is expected to retire in May, according to USNI News.



Labels:

Monday, June 21, 2021

Merle James Smith, Jr, USCG, Only In America

 

Coast Guard Academy's 1st Black Graduate, CDR Merle Smith Jr Dies

Among his myriad achievements, in Vietnam, he was the first Black officer to command a U.S. warship in combat and received the Bronze Star.

NEW LONDON, CT —In 1966, Merle J. Smith Jr. became the first Black graduate of the U.S. Coast Guard Academy. He'd go on to have a distinguished career including being the first Black officer to command a U.S. warship in close quarters combat and, "with his command of patrol boats amidst combat action during the Vietnam War," he was awarded the Bronze Star with the Combat "V."

On its Facebook page Monday, the Coast Guard Academy in New London announced with "heavy hearts" that has Smith died.

"The Coast Guard, the Academy, and the New London community lost a true hero and friend," the post reads. "We send our heartfelt support and appreciation to his wife Lynda, the Smith family, and all of his classmates, shipmates and friends."

His father was U.S. Army Colonel Merle J. Smith, a member of the Negro League's Kansas City Monarchs baseball team who served as an Army officer in counterintelligence and then in ordnance, specializing in nuclear weapons, according to a Coast Guard news story from 2017. As a military child, Merle Jr. grew up in Germany and Japan, and had a "thorough knowledge of history and politics, and proficiency in foreign languages." He was a football letterman in his Maryland high school, and a sports journalist. After his high school graduation, he was encouraged to apply to the Coast Guard Academy and began his Academy career in 1962 where he played football.

In the USCG story, it's noted Smith experienced "few problems with racism," while a cadet. In a Lyman Art Museum 2020 video exhibit called Stories of Resilience: Encountering Racism, his wife Lynda described him as "resilient."

Find out what's happening in New London with free, real-time updates from Patch.

"I've seen him spring back, jump back from times when he felt that the Coast Guard Academy did not necessarily understand the challenges of minority students and he would over and over and over again try to facilitate that understanding and try to bring knowledge and information to the academy by virtue of his own example and by virtue of just trying to share with staff, cadets and administration who he was and what he was," she was recorded saying.

Smith graduated from the USCGA in 1966 with a degree in science. For his first assignment, he served as communications officer and then operations officer aboard the 255-foot cutter Minnetonka. Next, Smith commanded the 95-foot cutter Cape Wash.

He was then sent to Southeast Asia to command 82-foot patrol boats in Vietnam including cutters Point Mast and Point Ellis and "directed more than 80 naval fire support missions in Operation Market Time," according to the Coast Guard. "In one Operation Sealords mission, his cutter accounted for the destruction of 10 enemy bunkers, four rocket launchers, 13 structures, and 19 sampans."

According to the Coast Guard, Smith received the Bronze Star Medal with "V" device, Navy Meritorious Unit Citation, Presidential Unit Citation, Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry and Vietnam Campaign Medal with four stars for his service in Vietnam.

Significantly, Smith was the first Black officer to command a U.S. warship in close quarters combat and was only the second Black Coast Guardsman to receive the Bronze Star Medal.

In Smith's Bronze Star citation, Navy Vice Adm. Elmo Zumwalt wrote, "He combined aggressive leadership with mature and prudent judgment to make his units highly effective combatant forces,according to the Coast Guard.

After returning from Vietnam, he served at Coast Guard headquarters in Washington, D.C. and spent more than two years on the international affairs staff, attended law school at George Washington University and served as deputy chief of the Coast Guard's Military Justice Division, according to a story from the Coast Guard.

In 1975, he became a member of the USCGA law faculty and in 1979, Smith joined the Reserves and began his civilian career as legal counsel for the Electric Boat while also teaching law classes part-time at the academy. In April 2016, the Coast Guard Academy honored Smith with a ceremony commemorating the 50th anniversary of his graduation.

Cmdr Merle James Smith, U.S. Coast Guard retired, and his wife Lynda during the he U.S. Coast Guard Academy 2016 Eclipse Awards Ceremony in 2016. Smith was honored on the 50th anniversary of his USCGA graduation. (Photo by US Coast Guard)

Labels:

Wednesday, March 24, 2021

I Pledge Alligance To The Flag Of The United States Of America

 

Commissioner blasts Racial & Social Justice Commission for not reciting pledge of allegiance

London Steverson, a retired Social Security Judge and Coast Guard Law Specialist, sits on the Prince William County Racial and Social Justice Commission.

 

A retired Administrative Law Judge who now sits on a newly formed Prince William County commission was outraged when, at the most recent meeting, commissioners didn’t start with a pledge of allegiance to the flag.

The pledge is commonplace at the county’s other meetings, including at the Board of County Supervisors.

So, he recited it himself at the end of the March 18 meeting of the Racial and Social Justice Commission, which took place at the county’s government center in Woodbridge.

“I am insulted we didn’t start this meeting with the pledge of allegiance or opening prayer. Not even the Congress or the House of Representatives is so un-American,” the Coast Guard veteran said, as he chastised fellow Commissioner Shantell Rock of Woodbridge, who serves as its chairwoman.

Instead of the pledge of allegiance, Rock asked commissioners to recite an equity communication pledge which asks commissioners to avoid using statements like “I think, I feel, I believe,” and promise not to challenge others when talking about the issue of race, and not to include their personal perspectives. “You are here to listen and serve the discussion, not to join it,” states the pledge.

It was the first time commissioners were presented with the equity pledge. Not one recited it, while another commissioner, Mac Haddow, of Gainesville, objected.

“This is my time. You can choose to recite it or not to recite it,” Rock replied to Haddow’s opposition.

Meanwhile, Steverson recalled his past as a young Black man growing up in the segregated South in the Jim Crow era.

“I know racism. It’s not just something I learned about in a liberal arts discussion group,” said the retired judge. “I’m an affirmative action baby. I was able to go from the cotton fields to the courtroom in 20 years,” said Steverson.

Commissioners spent most of the meeting trying to get data on accounts of reported racism from county officials, including the police chief. There were few to report. However, commissioners pressed on, saying they would seek equity in the community.

“I’ve battled racism. I’ve battled cancel culture. I don’t believe in guaranteeing equal outcomes [equity]. I believe in ensuring equal opportunity,” said Steverson.

Steverson, a published author, retired from the Social Security Administration in 2009, where he worked as an appeals judge. He worked as a Law Specialist in the U.S. Coast Guard–a position similar to that of a JAG lawyer in the Navy, from 1968 to 1988.

The commission is scheduled for a work session today, March 22, at 7 p.m. at the McCoart Building at the county government center in Woodbridge.

Its next full meeting is scheduled for April 15.

The Prince William Board of County Supervisors created the Racial and Social Justice Commission in October 2020 to serve as another layer of governmental oversight, on top of the county’s Equal Rights Commission that has been in place since 1992.

The Racial and Social Justice Commission is tasked with filing a report with the Board of County Supervisors in December to include a snapshot of actual or perceived racism in the county.

 

Labels:

Saturday, September 19, 2020

One Of The Greatest Generation

One of The Greatest Generation, my Father's Generation.
The kind of man I grew up surrounded by in my segregated southern neighborhood. Before Black neighborhoods became infested with drugs and guns, when Families went to church once or twice a week. They worked Blue-collar and menial jobs, participated in and watched professional as well as neighborhood sports. They loved America and the Flag. Stopped whatever they were doing and stood at attention during the National Anthem. Yes, them stood in the back of the bus, and drank from water fountains designated as "For Colored Only". They responded politely when addressed as Boy, hey you, the N-word, and worse. But, they prayed for a brighter day further on up the road, and truly believed that thing were getting better every day. WHAT They DID NOT DO was loot, steal, burn buildings and others peoples' property. If they had deviant sexual predilections, they kept them in the closet. There was "A Sense of Privacy" then. They considered themselves as Americans; yes, Americans first and Black, second; not African or African-Americans. Many had been in America for up to 10 Generations, not Fresh-Off-The-Boat unassimilated Immigrants. They did not have high opinions of all of their fellow citizens from across the tracks, but they loved America. They were men with balls. They were not Snowflakes, wussies or wimps. They did not covet other peoples' stuff. They lived within their means. I could go on but, if you do not get my point now, then you never will. ( https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B006WQKFJM)

Labels:

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

U.S. Troops Battling Racism Report High Barrier to Justice

https://cgachasehall.blogspot.com/2013/04/why-was-webster-smith-court-martialed.html                                                            

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - By the time he saw a swastika scrawled in the bathroom at Barksdale Air Force base in October 2018, Deven Sherk was already disillusioned with how the Air Force handled racism complaints. The Black airman had filed a complaint alleging discrimination that June when a fellow airman, a white man, hung a noose near him on the base.
“I felt that was a direct threat to my life,” said Sherk, who was a staff sergeant specializing in B-52 bomber maintenance at the time.
Along with the noose, he reported seeing a whip on display at the hangar where he worked, with slogans including “Fuckin Attitude Adjuster” written in marker. Sherk says he never felt the Air Force's Equal Opportunity office took seriously his complaints of racism. So, he decided against filing a formal complaint about the swastika.
By February of 2019, the Air Force said it quietly censured several people over Sherk’s complaint, but the sergeant’s career was over. He says he found himself pushed out of the service with an honorable discharge after suffering depression and anxiety.
“Incidents like these must stop,” an Air Force spokeswoman said of Sherk’s case. “We are committed to ensuring our Air Force is a place of respect, diversity and inclusion.”
                                                   


As America confronts the question of systemic racial injustice, the U.S. military, which has long promoted itself as an egalitarian system focused on merit and achievement, is undergoing its own moment of reckoning.
 https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B006WQKFJM
Earlier this summer, as the military braced for a deployment amid nationwide protests over police violence against Black Americans, top defense officials acknowledged a lack of diversity among leadership. The Air Force’s newly appointed first Black chief of staff supported these concerns when he shared his own stories of bias during his climb to the top. The Army is grappling with calls to rechristen bases named for Confederate generals. And the Pentagon has launched an initiative to “ensure equal opportunity across all ranks.”
But interviews with dozens of current and former U.S. service members reveal deep skepticism about whether coming forward with concrete allegations of discrimination will be beneficial. Especially daunting, they say, is using the complaint process specifically set up to address concerns from members of the Armed Forces.
So-called Equal Opportunity offices are located on U.S. military bases around the world, established to give troops access to some of the protections against discrimination that American civilians can tap through a separate system, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity. Troops, who are not considered employees, have the right to seek investigations through EO offices.
But many service members, including Sherk, say the EO process is often a dead end, resulting in little action, or worse, backfiring on the complainant. That’s because filing an EO complaint is often viewed as an act of defiance in the military, they say.
                                           


Data obtained by Reuters show that service members rarely file formal EO complaints when compared to their civilian employee counterparts within the Defense Department. The Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines employ some 1.3 million active duty personnel, about double the civilian workforce. But civilians file far more complaints than troops.
Last year, 71 sailors formally complained of discrimination on the basis of race or color, one-sixth as many as the 404 complaints filed by the Navy's smaller civilian workforce. Navy uniformed personnel filed about 21 complaints per 100,000 personnel while their civilian co-workers filed about 200.
The Army saw 107 formal Equal Opportunity complaints by soldiers involving racial discrimination in 2019, one-fifth the number filed by its civilian workforce. The Air Force reported 92 formal complaints in 2019 involving race and color from a force of 400,000 active duty or reserve airmen. That was a third of the number filed by civilians in the service.
The vast gap between uniformed military complaints and those of their civilian counterparts in the Army, Navy and Air Force has not been previously reported. Few troops’ complaints were substantiated in 2019: 6% in the Navy and 18% and 35%, respectively, in the Air Force and Army. Reuters does not have sufficient data to compare those rates to outcomes of civilian complaints.
“There is a career downside risk to coming forward and rocking the boat,” said Rep. Jackie Speier, a California Democrat who leads the Military Personnel panel on the House Armed Services Committee.
In corporate America, and in government jobs, too, employees can sue their employer over discrimination. Not so for U.S. troops, who enter a process in which the military investigates itself, said Don Christensen, a retired chief prosecutor for the Air Force.
“There's not much incentive to use the process because it rarely works, and they rarely rule in their favor,” said Christensen, who leads the advocacy group Protect Our Defenders, whose research has drawn attention to racial discrimination in the military.
Informal complaints focus on finding an agreeable resolution and can include mediation. The formal complaints process is the most in-depth form of inquiry.
That system begins when a service member fills out an EO form that kick-starts the process. From there, an investigating officer is appointed by a commander and conducts interviews and collects evidence, from photographs to emails and evaluations, that could indicate racial bias.
EO officials work to ensure that service members understand the process and are kept up to date on developments. But ultimately, military commanders decide whether a complaint is founded and, if so, what punitive action should follow. A military judge advocate can provide input.
The Pentagon, presented with Reuters’ findings, said survey data show service members prefer to take complaints to their chain of command instead of an EO office. And, the military explicitly encourages troops to first attempt to resolve their cases at the lowest command level before going to an EO officer.
Some say the system is wrought by an inherent conflict of interest. The only way to improve the process “is to completely remove the reporting system from the chain of command,” said Captain Deshauna Barber, a Black officer in the Army Reserve and activist on behalf of women service members.
The end result of fewer complaints, Reuters found, is that the military is likely less aware of discrimination happening day-to-day than it would be if U.S. troops were incentivized to come forward.
The Pentagon said it encourages reporting of “problematic behaviors.” But it acknowledged troops’ concerns about the EO process and said Defense Secretary Mark Esper has directed the military’s independent Inspector Generals to investigate the efficacy of the program.
DISPARITY AT THE TOP
The U.S. armed forces have great racial and gender diversity at lower ranks, but the top brass is predominantly white and male, a fact made plain in a revealing photo last year of President Donald Trump surrounded by American military leaders, with not a single woman or Black officer in sight at the time.
From the halls of the Pentagon to the military academies, minorities who make up more than a third of the armed forces are starting to speak out about a culture that, they say, creates a feeling of exclusion.
After becoming the first Black American to be the top-ranked cadet at West Point in 2018, Army First Lieutenant Simone Askew said in a letter circulated online that she found a photoshopped picture of her, slipped under her door, “with a monkey's face over my own.”
“More racist caricatures and comments continued to circulate online. One of the popular images even depicted me as Satan himself,” Askew wrote. She declined to comment.
Askew's testimony was included in a June letter by a group of prominent graduates and cadets at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point that denounced pervasive racism in the Army's most hallowed institution. It came less than two weeks after President Trump delivered a commencement address there.
“I had a racist roommate that would call me the n-word and spit on me,” said a cadet in another example cited in the letter.
The U.S. Military Academy said it received the letter and that the West Point Inspector General “has begun a comprehensive review of all matters involving race.” A spokesman added, “The Academy expects all Cadets to be treated with dignity and respect.”
Air Force General Charles Brown Jr made history on August 6 by taking over as the first Black chief of a U.S. military service. Before assuming command, Brown candidly recounted in a video his experiences with discrimination during his career.
In one example, he spoke of wearing the same flight suit and wings as his peers “and then being questioned by another military member: ‘Are you a pilot?’”
One sailor stationed in Naples, Italy, took the opportunity to address racism in a town hall July 17 with Defense Secretary Esper and General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
“In my experience in the Navy, although it's been a great one, I ran into some people that only judged me by the color of my skin, and not by the quality of my work,” said Operations Specialist First Class Heandel Pierre. Milley replied that U.S. troops were “willing to die” for core American principles like equality.
U.S. military leaders appear to be listening, taking stands that clashed with Trump after he defended people flying the Confederate flag and threatened to militarize the U.S. response to protests of the May 25 death of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
Esper opposed using active duty troops to quell protests. He has issued a de facto ban on the flag of the Confederacy, the breakaway Southern states that waged war on the United States to preserve slavery. General Milley, Trump's top military adviser, has called for a hard look at U.S. military facilities named after Confederate generals.
Milley recalled in July how a Black Army staff sergeant once told him at North Carolina’s Fort Bragg that they “went to work everyday on a base that represented a guy who enslaved his grandparents.” Fort Bragg, one America’s largest military bases, was named after Confederate general Braxton Bragg.
NO RELIEF
Lieutenant Commander Kimberly Young-McLear said she contemplated suicide in the weeks after announcing her intention to file a formal EO complaint at the Coast Guard Academy in 2016, where she was a professor, alleging workplace bullying tied to her race, gender and sexual orientation.
Young-McLear said she was subjected to degrading comments, her work was undermined and her reputation damaged. As she pressed her accusations, Young-McLear said she was retaliated against with a lower performance evaluation – an allegation confirmed by an inspector general’s investigation.
Even after being vindicated, she worries that little has changed. “Either people are too afraid to report because they don't trust the system because of retaliation, or if it is reported, it gets immediately swept under the rug,” she said.
A June report by the Department of Homeland Security's Inspector General found repeated failures in the Coast Guard Academy's response to discrimination complaints. Many cadets surveyed said they understood how to report harassment, “but may not do so out of fear of negative consequences,” the report said.
The Coast Guard told Reuters it was working on improvements and that it recognized “there are members that still experience discrimination, bullying and harassment.”
Many service members conclude they’d gain little by filing formal complaints. “If you want to progress, you don't make a whole lot of waves, do you? There's no great incentive to come forward,” said Vincent Stewart, a retired Marine three star general.

LESSONS FROM SEXUAL ASSAULT

 https://cgachasehall.blogspot.com/2013/04/why-was-webster-smith-court-martialed.html
The full extent of discrimination in the military is unclear. The latest publicly available Pentagon data dates to a 2013 survey, which said some 16% of minorities in the active duty force experienced harassment, discrimination or both because of their race or ethnicity.
A higher percentage, 39%, of minorities reported potentially discriminatory behavior prohibited by Pentagon policy, anything from racist jokes to offensive remarks about their accents or language skills. Thirty percent said they considered leaving the military. Still, the vast majority didn’t report the issues to anyone.
Advocates say the military’s handling of sexual assaults provides additional clues that the problem is greater than the number of EO complaints would indicate.
In the latest Defense Department survey, in 2018, nearly one out of every four female service members indicated experiencing behavior consistent with sexual harassment. That would suggest over 50,000 women. But the actual number of formal harassment complaints was 1,021 last year. Advocates see a parallel with racial bias concerns.
Maryland Rep. Anthony Brown, a retired Army Reserve colonel and the only member of the Congressional Black Caucus on the House Armed Services Committee, secured House passage of an amendment that would require more regular surveys on racism and white supremacy. The aim is to create a consistent set of data on racism that’s closer to what is available on sexual assault and harassment.
Disciplinary data and reports by government agencies and nonprofit advocates reveal racial disparities in the military’s rate of investigations and punishments.
A 2019 report by the congressional watchdog U.S. Government Accountability Office said Black service members were more than twice as likely as whites to face judicial investigations in the Coast Guard, Army, Navy and Marine Corps from 2013-2017.
                                                   


Blacks were also about twice as likely to be tried in courts-martial in the Army, Navy and Marines, the GAO found. In the Air Force, Blacks were about 1.5 times more likely to face a court martial.
                                             


SUPREME COURT CHALLENGE
In the regimented world of the U.S military, service members accept that they cannot exercise all the liberties enjoyed by civilians. They do not have the same freedoms of speech, are not free to leave their jobs whenever they choose and can be court martialed if they attempt to do so. Given the risk of death or injury in war, under longstanding legal precedent they cannot sue if killed in combat, by accident, or even from medical malpractice.
                                                 


One former service member is trying to get the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on troops' inability to sue over racial discrimination.
Gary Jackson, who was discharged from the Marine Corps nearly three decades ago, is trying to sue the Navy, alleging discrimination that ultimately cut short his career. He said a supervisor transferred him at a Marine base in Arlington, Virginia, and then said, “That’s one less Black Staff Sergeant,” according to a written statement by a witness submitted in the case.
If Jackson prevailed, troops could seek legal recourse under Civil Rights Act protections against workplace discrimination. But legal experts are unsure whether the Supreme Court will agree later this year to take up the issue, seeing the case as a longshot after lower courts ruled against him.
In an amicus brief in support of Jackson’s motion, Protect Our Defenders and another advocacy group, the Black Veterans Project, called the EO process a “woefully inadequate system for addressing racial bias or discrimination.”
Sherk, the airman shown the noose, said his final months in uniform left their mark. Before leaving the service in 2019, he was accused of dereliction of duty involving an unattended aircraft. Sherk fought the charge, saying the incident at the Louisiana military base was not his fault, and in a court martial hearing was found not guilty. The Air Force declined comment on his case.
Asked about Sherk’s reports about the noose and other allegations, the Air Force said several service members faced administrative action, which can include a censure, but did not elaborate.
Reuters saw a single letter of reprimand given to an airman over the noose incident, which Sherk obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. In the letter, the Air Force wrote, “a noose represents lynching; a historic act used to traumatize African Americans into obedience and segregation.”
These days, Sherk said he is piecing his life back together after the loss of his military career, selling used cars in Detroit.
“I feel cheated,” Sherk said. “This is not what I imagined myself doing.”
 By Phil Stewart, M.B. Pell and Joshua Schneyer
(Reporting by Phil Stewart, M.B. Pell and Joshua Schneyer. Editing by Ronnie Greene)
#justice  #ucgc



Labels: